Home Chemistry Case Study

Screening for Antibody to the Human Immunodeficiency Virus Case Study

Course

Subject
Chemistry

Category
Case Study

Pages
16

Uploaded By
ATIPROS

Learning Objectives After completing this case study, the participant should be able to: G Define and perform calculations of sensitivity, specificity, predictive-value positive, and predictive-value negative; G Describe the relationship between prevalence and predictive value; G Discuss the trade-offs between sensitivity and specificity; G List the principles of a good screening program. This case study was developed in 1987 by Lyle Peterson, Guthrie Birkhead, and Richard Dicker. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Public Health Service CDC-EIS, 2003: Screening for HIV (871-703) – Instructor'sPART I In December 1982, a report in the MMWR described three persons who had developed acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) but who had neither of the previously known risk factors for the disease: homosexual/bisexual activity with numerous partners and intravenous drug use. These three persons had previously received whole-blood transfusions. By 1983, widespread recognition of the problem of transfusion-related AIDS led to controversial recommendations that persons in known high-risk groups voluntarily defer from donating blood. In June 1984, after the discovery of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), five companies were licensed to produce enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (EIA, then called ELISA) test kits for detecting HIV antibody. A Food and Drug Administration (FDA) spokesman stated that, "...getting this test out to the blood banks is our No. 1 priority...." Blood bank directors were anxiously waiting to start screening blood with the new test until March 2, 1985, the date the first test kit was approved by the FDA. In the pre-licensure evaluation, sensitivity and specificity of the test kits were estimated using blood samples from four groups: those with AIDS by CDC criteria, those with other Test result Positive Negative Total NOTES ON SENSITIVITYActual antibodyPresent True positive (A) False negative (C) All with antibody (A+C) Sensitivity - the probability that the test result will be positive when administered to persons who actually have the antibody. = true positives / all with antibody Algebraically, sensitivity = A / (A+C) Specificity - the probability that the test result will be negative when administered to persons who are actually without the antibody. = true negatives / all without antibody Algebraically, specificity = D / (B+D). Guide Page 2 symptoms and signs of HIV infection, those with various autoimmune disorders and neoplastic diseases that could give a false-positive test result, and presumably healthy blood and plasma donors. Numerous complex issues were discussed even before licensure. Among them were understanding the magnitude of the problem of false-positive test results, and determining whether test-positive blood donors should be notified. It is now March 2, 1985. The first HIV antibody test kits will arrive in blood banks in the state in a few hours. Meeting with State Epidemiologist to discuss the appropriate use of this test are the Commissioner of Health, the medical director of the regional blood bank, and the chief of the State Drug Abuse Commission. To help in the discussions, the State Epidemiologist turns to pre-licensure information regarding the sensitivity and specificity of test kit A. The information indicates that the sensitivity of test kit A is 95.0% (0.95) and the specificity is 98.0% (0.98). These and related measures are reviewed below.
Read More

Preview 4 out of 16 Pages

pdf (1).pdf prev1731004478672d083e9ef17.png

Download all 16 pages for $ 9.00

Reviews (0)

$ 9.00


Seller

Joined: 6 months ago

Document sold: 0

Reviews received
1
0
0
0
0

Send Message
Document Information
Buy Document

$9.00